Regarding the topic of “letting go” in “How to Pursue the Truth,” we fellowshipped up to the content involving notions and imaginings within the subject of “letting go of the barriers between oneself and God and one’s hostility toward God.” The past few times, we fellowshipped on “letting go of notions and imaginings about God incarnate.” Today we will continue fellowshipping on this. Regarding notions and imaginings about God incarnate, we fellowshipped on some topics involving the normal humanity of God incarnate, right? So what did we fellowship on last time? We fellowshipped on some specific manifestations involving the living out and revelations of the normal humanity of God incarnate, as well as some principles of self-conduct and doing things within the normal humanity of God incarnate, and then we fellowshipped on what things God incarnate does not do in terms of His humanity. Fellowshipping on these aspects helps people better understand the disposition essence of God’s incarnate flesh and His principles of self-conduct and doing things, as well as some of His specific manifestations and revelations. When we fellowship about these manifestations of God incarnate—whether in the form of facts, examples, or specific principles for doing things—they involve all kinds of minor matters in life. They don’t seem to involve any of the great, pioneering feats or noble actions worthy of admiration that exist in people’s notions and imaginings; God incarnate’s manifestations are all very common and very ordinary. Precisely because God incarnate lives among this ordinary, corrupt humankind, these normal and practical manifestations of His are, in one respect, the inevitable manifestations of the humanity of God’s incarnate flesh, and in another respect, a normal need of God incarnate living among humankind. Of course, these normal and practical manifestations also provide people with some information or paths regarding knowing God. They allow people to know God’s practicality and normality through the incarnate God’s practical living out and practical principles of self-conduct among people, and also to know the God in heaven, enabling them to more accurately understand the God in heaven, and accurately understand His essence as a normal, ordinary person on earth.

Some people say, “These things and examples You talk about involving the normal humanity of God incarnate are all very ordinary; they are all very insignificant and unremarkable things in daily life. Can You talk about some facts that feel mysterious and unfathomable, or that seem particularly grand?” To this I say, up to now, there really haven’t been any. God incarnate lives within the reality of normal humanity, and in a specific living environment, and apart from doing the work of God Himself, He spends the rest of His time within the scope of the life of His normal humanity, interacting with the brothers and sisters or handling some trivial problems in the church. So, apart from the examples we fellowshipped on involving the principles and credos by which He conducts Himself and does things, He does not carry out any of the great, pioneering feats or extraordinary deeds that you imagine. This may be unexpected to people, and it may not conform to people’s notions and imaginings, but this is how things are as a matter of fact. Our fellowship on the topic of God incarnate has mainly concerned some manifestations, living out, and specific principles of self-conduct and doing things of God incarnate in His normal humanity. This is different from how the deeds of great figures and famous people are recounted in the world. When people in the world talk about some great, famous, or exceptional figure, they always talk about how unique, extraordinary, and great they are, and they talk about their charisma, mainly focusing on how lofty and grand they are. However, what we talk about involving God incarnate is exactly the opposite of what the world says about those exceptional figures and great people. We mainly talk about how God incarnate is normal, practical, ordinary, and not extraordinary. We only talk about concrete examples—minor examples from daily life, at that—talking about what the principles and views involved in His self-conduct and doing things are. These thoughts and views, principles, and methods of self-conduct and doing things are all based on the conscience and reason of normal humanity. We mainly talk about how He conducts Himself and how He does things. In the world, however, very few people talk about how to conduct oneself. Even if some people have talked about this topic, they’ve been unable to give many specific examples, much less have they been able to express any principles of self-conduct. They do not talk about what positive principles, positive methods, or correct thoughts and views famous people and great figures have in conducting themselves and doing things. They only talk about their achievements, their talent and learning, and their spirit, and they also talk about what kind of dominant position they occupy among humankind because of these things. What they talk about is exactly the opposite of the normal humanity possessed and borne by God incarnate that we are fellowshipping on today. What God’s incarnate flesh lets you know and understand are the principles and credos of self-conduct and doing things that are lived out and possessed within His normal and practical humanity. These principles and credos of self-conduct and doing things correspond perfectly to God’s requirements for the humankind He intends to save. God’s incarnate flesh possesses such humanity, and possesses the various thoughts and views—along with His principles and credos of self-conduct and doing things—within this normal and practical humanity. It is only because of this that He can represent God in doing the work of God Himself, and complete the work and ministry that God incarnate ought to perform well in this age, within such humanity, that He can fully make known to humankind the representative disposition that God intends to express in this age, and—of course—be fully competent for the work of expressing the truth that God intends to do in this stage of work. If the humanity essence lived out, revealed, and possessed by God’s incarnate flesh were not this normality, practicality, and ordinariness that we’ve been fellowshipping on, or if He did not possess these principles and credos of self-conduct that we’ve been fellowshipping on, but instead possessed the humanity essence of the famous people and great figures that nonbelievers talk about and revere, what would this result in? (He would not be able to lead us to walk the way of fearing God and shunning evil.) It would result in a completely different situation. Suppose that God’s incarnate flesh possessed the humanity essence of a nonbelieving great figure or famous person—a person who is towering, extraordinary, unique, mysterious and unfathomable. This kind of person has no boundaries in conducting themselves and doing things, lies constantly, and does not conduct themselves or do things in a rule-abiding or well-behaved manner, and does not know their place or act dutifully, and their pursuits, thoughts, and views are the same as those of nonbelievers—just pursuing lofty and grand things, and focusing on gifts, knowledge, and supernatural abilities. What kind of path would this kind of person lead you onto? (They would not be able to lead us onto the path of salvation. On the contrary, those who followed them would only become increasingly corrupt and wicked.) Such a person does not have positive principles of self-conduct; their methods and principles of self-conduct are not positive, but satanic. Thus, the principles and credos of self-conduct of this person who is of Satan are highly representative of their humanity essence. What are the pursuits of and path walked by a person with this kind of humanity essence? They are exactly the same as Satan’s. Their pursuits and the path they walk all come from Satan and are compatible with Satan. Then wouldn’t those who followed them follow their leadership, have the same pursuits as them, and walk the same path? (Yes.) Those people would follow their leadership, imitate their principles of self-conduct, and, like them, pursue knowledge, status, supernaturalness, and lofty and grand things, everything that is extraordinary, and everything that seems mysterious and unfathomable to people. No one could attain salvation by following such a person; instead, they would become increasingly degenerate. Such a group could not be called a church, mainly because they all would have divorced themselves from God’s work and would not have the work of the Holy Spirit. The leader they followed would not be established by God, much less sent by God. Even if they all called themselves a church, it would be of no use; God would ignore them. No matter how much they all called themselves a church, God would not acknowledge them, and the Holy Spirit would not work on them. That leader would teach people to do whatever it is they like; they would provide people with whatever they possess within themselves, and that is what people would gain from them. They do not have the truth, and could not provide people with any positive things or guide them in the correct direction, so it would be impossible for people to gain the truth from them. At best, people would only be able to acquire a bit of knowledge and learn some professional skills from the nonbelieving world or some capabilities in a particular field from them. In short, someone like this, who does not possess normality and practicality, or the divine essence as their life, could not be called God incarnate; they could not bring people before God, nor could they lead people onto the path of salvation. Looking at these facts, among humankind, is there anyone other than God’s incarnate flesh who can represent God to do His work? (No.) Is there anyone who can represent God to save humankind from their corrupt dispositions? (No.) The life and humanity essence possessed by any member of ordinary humankind are virtually all the same—such life and humanity essence have all been corrupted by Satan; for people, corrupt dispositions are their life. Thus, whether viewed from the perspective of people’s humanity or people’s life essence, not a single person among all of humankind is competent for this work of God incarnate, nor can any corrupt human being represent God to save corrupt humankind from corruption. Naturally, these facts also tell people: No corrupt human being can tell humankind what positive things are and what negative things are, and no corrupt human being can tell people what the truth is or what God’s intentions actually are. What corrupt humans provide to other people is only knowledge, as well as the various skills, capabilities, or gifts pursued by corrupt humankind, and various tactics of self-conduct and doing things, philosophies for worldly dealings, and various thoughts and views that come from Satan. Human beings of all races share a common trait. What is this common trait? They all regard the relatively positive, or relatively well-intentioned, conservative, and traditional things among themselves, as positive things, and try to replace the truth and God’s intentions with them. People believe that by holding on to these things, they have gained the true way and can attain salvation. In fact, these things have absolutely nothing to do with God’s requirements for humankind. You see, among humankind, no matter how shrewd people are, no matter how great their gifts or how talented and learned they are, or how kind and benevolent their humanity may seem on the outside, not a single person can understand the truth, and not a single person can discern what positive things are and what negative things are. Before God did His work, and before God expressed His words, nearly everyone regarded traditional culture as a positive thing, and some people even revered traditional culture as the truth. Therefore, no matter how you look at it, if it were not God incarnate expressing these truths and doing this work within normal humanity, but instead any member of humankind doing this work, they would only lead people onto a path that deviates from God’s words and intentions.

Let’s look at a simple example. If people are asked to choose costumes for a dance program, how will they choose? In theory, everyone knows that when believers in God produce a dance program, especially for a video that will be published online, the clothes they wear and their demeanor represent God’s people. So, the costumes chosen should be dignified and upright, not outlandish outfits. When it comes to being dignified and upright, there’s a lot that goes into it. Going by people’s notions, what kind of clothing is considered dignified and upright? It is the clothing that various ethnic groups wear most commonly, clothing that is relatively traditional and conservative and looks appropriate to everyone. It is not outlandish or overly trendy. This is what, going by people’s notions, they consider to be dignified and upright clothing. What are the views of most brothers and sisters in the church regarding choosing costumes for programs? You see, when filming a movie, the views held by the person in charge of costumes actually represent the views of most people. The clothing styles they choose are all those commonly worn by most people in the eighties and nineties. The colors are mostly blue, khaki, or gray, with only variations in how dark or light they are. Overall, it’s just those two or three simple colors. Why don’t they choose some bright colors? According to people’s notions, believers in God are all dignified and upright good people, so they should choose these few most common, most ordinary colors for their clothes. You see, such a simple matter as choosing the style and color of costumes completely reveals the notions and the fallacious thoughts and views about believing in God in people’s hearts. That is, people harbor a very serious notion within them; many people believe that believing in God requires sticking to the old ways and restoring tradition. According to their notions, only traditional, old, backward, and stale things are positive things, and only these are what pleases God. Is this what most people think? (Yes.) This is what’s in people’s minds. People all define those traditional, backward, old, and antiquated things as positive things. Therefore, in program production, people cannot even make accurate choices regarding the colors and styles of costumes, which is one of the simplest and most basic matters. They all measure this issue using their notions, and are particularly conservative, as well as particularly foolish and stubborn. Tell Me, just how many notions must people have about God! The positive things defined by people, and the things people think God likes, are all traditional culture as conceived in people’s notions, or the things among humankind that are accepted and recognized by worldly people; they have absolutely nothing to do with the truth. So tell Me, am I a traditionalist or a modernist? (God is neither a traditionalist nor a modernist.) Some people say, “Through what You have fellowshipped, we know that You do not like traditional culture, because You live in the present. At the very least, You are not traditional, and You do not stick to the old ways.” You say I am not traditional, so am I a modernist? (No.) How can you tell that I am not a modernist? (People in the world today are rather fond of trends, but God teaches us to be dignified and upright, which runs counter to trends.) It’s not just people today who like trends; people in ancient times also liked trends. Nonbelievers all like trends. Liking trends does not mean one is a modernist. So how should this question be answered? Ponder it for a bit. Have you ever seen Me wear ancient clothing? Do I wear traditional clothing? I wear modern clothing. This involves the normal humanity of God incarnate. Whichever age God incarnate lives in, and whatever level of development people of that age have reached in terms of handling basic necessities, His normal humanity naturally adopts the same method as they do for this; He will not go backward. Is this not a manifestation of normal humanity? (Yes.) His normal humanity has rationality, so when it comes to basic necessities, He naturally knows what is appropriate to choose. This is in one regard. In another, whether it is tradition or modernity, it is not a form, but rather represents a trend of thought and a viewpoint. So is tradition positive, or is modernity positive? The way I see it, neither is positive. Neither has anything to do with the truth; both are produced by corrupt humankind under the influence of Satan. Whether it’s traditional thoughts and views, or modern thoughts and views, whatever doesn’t come from God is a negative thing, not a positive thing. Whether it’s traditional basic necessities, or modern basic necessities, their purpose is always to satisfy the needs of normal humanity. No matter which age God incarnate is born into, He lives within normal and practical humanity, and His principles of self-conduct and doing things do not change. In everything He does and in His treatment of everything, He acts according to the principles of God’s words and the principles that arise from His inner life disposition; He does not preserve or follow tradition, nor does He follow modernity or chase trends. Therefore, the requirements of the incarnate God for those who follow Him are neither based on tradition nor influenced by modernity. The various thoughts and views or truths that He possesses and fellowships all originate from God, from God’s divine essence and God’s life; they have nothing to do with either traditional culture or modern knowledge.

When looking at the costumes chosen for the dance programs produced by God’s house, have you been able to discern any principles? Why were those styles and those colors chosen? If you can understand the principles here, then you truly understand a bit of the truth, and you have spiritual understanding; if you cannot even understand the principles in such a simple matter, then you are a muddleheaded person whose caliber is too poor, and you have not understood the truth despite listening to sermons for so many years. To start with, when we produce dance programs, are the clothes the performers wear traditional or modern? (They’re modern.) They’re all modern clothes—ordinary, everyday outfits at that. Some people do not understand, saying, “Our dance programs are artistic programs, so why do the performers just wear ordinary, everyday outfits instead of stage costumes? Outfits with beads and sequins on them are particularly gorgeous. Look at the outfits worn on stage by those national-level dance troupes—they’re gorgeous, exquisite, and regal, and they look dazzling when the lights hit them. If our performers also wore such outfits when we produce programs, wouldn’t that make them look better and glorify God more? Wouldn’t it better manifest the power of God’s house, and better allow nonbelievers or religious people to see the strength of God’s house?” Is this viewpoint correct? (No.) Tell Me this, first of all—why do the performers wear ordinary, everyday outfits instead of gorgeous costumes when we produce dance programs? (If the brothers and sisters all wear particularly gorgeous costumes when dancing, the audience will focus on the clothes and what the performers look like. But if they wear ordinary clothes and look like dignified and upright people, the audience will not be attracted by these outward things, and will focus their minds on God’s words.) You are right about one thing—not wearing gorgeous costumes is to prevent people from focusing on form and outward appearance. There’s also another point, which is most important: Whether it’s dancing or singing, when we produce programs, what is the purpose? (To bear witness to God.) This is the only goal. Whether dancing or singing, it’s all to bear witness to God. It’s not to highlight any individual, nor is it to please anyone; it is just to bear witness to God. So, it is enough for the performers to wear simple, well-fitting, dignified and upright, and tasteful clothes that achieve the purpose of bearing witness to God. By nature, the programs we produce are not entertainment programs. What are entertainment programs? Entertainment programs are things people watch for recreation in their spare time; they are just to please people. When people rest, they watch a program to have fun, relax, feel happy, forget their worries, and relieve stress. Afterward, they go back to whatever work they have to do, without dwelling on it or having any feelings about it. This is what entertainment programs are. What about the programs we do? In terms of form, they are entertainment, but in essence, they are not to please the public, nor are they to show off artistic skill. The goal of the programs we produce is to bear witness to God. For example, when producing hymn programs, the purpose of hymns of God’s words is to bear witness to and propagate the truth of God’s words, allowing people to come before God; the purpose of experiential hymns is to bear witness to the effects achieved by God’s work and the results God’s work has produced in people. In short, no matter what kind of programs we produce, they are not purely entertainment programs. Their purpose is not to catch people’s eyes or help people kill time and entertain themselves, much less is it to show off artistic skill. There is only one goal for the programs we produce, which is to propagate God’s words and bear witness to God’s work, letting more people know that God has become flesh and has been carrying out a new stage of work, letting more people know that God’s work has already gained a group of people, and that God is working and speaking now. This is the sole purpose of the programs we produce. Since this is the purpose of the programs we produce, if people wear gorgeous clothes and heavy makeup, and have all sorts of getups, doesn’t that conflict with the goal of bearing witness to God? (Yes.) That is a conflict. Therefore, we do not focus on what the performers wear. What is the only thing we focus on? We focus only on whether what the programs present—the brothers’ and sisters’ demeanor, the dance movements, and the form of the programs—can draw people’s attention, and whether they can get people to like them and become interested in them, thereby giving people a favorable impression and helping people become willing to investigate God’s work, accept God’s words, and sing hymns and worship God together with the brothers and sisters—this is the purpose we want to achieve. To achieve this purpose, as far as the outfits and appearance of the performers go, they just have to look dignified and upright, clean and neat, and have a particularly good demeanor; as for the rest—gorgeous costumes, heavy makeup, and all kinds of getups—those all have negative effects. What negative effects? If the dancing sisters are all dressed up like celestial maidens, and the brothers are all dressed up like handsome guys or wealthy heirs, when people see this, they will think, “You are showing off. Aren’t you harboring ill intentions? Aren’t you seducing people?” If people have these thoughts, that is not good. The brothers and sisters dress in a dignified and upright, and tasteful and appropriate manner. Although, overall, they may not look elegant, they are particularly clean, neat, dignified, and tasteful. When people look at them, they see that these people have a good demeanor, that they are believers in God, and that the program they are producing is one that bears witness to God, not something crooked or evil. You see, nonbelieving programs are all about making eyes, blowing kisses, or showing off the performers’ figures. While dancing, besides showing off their craft, the performers also flaunt their charms, offering not the slightest positive guidance. In contrast, the programs we produce convey wholly positive guidance. Even if viewers do want to harbor improper thoughts, they find no opportunity or loopholes by which to do so. If they want to check out the performers’ figures and facial features, they can’t get a good look; if they want to see who’s flaunting their charms, they cannot see that either. They only see one expression—a smile—presenting an entirely dignified and upright bearing. Most importantly, our programs are not about showing off or pleasing anyone, but are for bearing witness to God; this is a core principle. In addition, regarding the clothing styles we chose for the dance team—T-shirts, sweatshirts, and sweatpants—people might feel quite comfortable dancing in them, but some young people might not really like them based on their own tastes. They feel that these styles are too ordinary, that it’s just everyday casual wear, stuff you wear around the house, but this is exactly what dignified and upright clothes are. T-shirts, sweatshirts, and sweatpants are the most common styles of casual wear nowadays. Why do we choose these styles? I have observed that it has probably been at least several decades by now since this style of casual wear first appeared. We choose this style for our programs now out of consideration of the fact that even in another few decades, it will not be outdated or obsolete. Moreover, this style is suitable for people of all age groups and all social classes; whether they are ordinary people or upper-class people, they all wear such clothes at home in their daily lives. Furthermore, these clothes are loose and comfortable for dancing. Thus, we eventually decided on this style of clothing for the stage costumes. Regardless of whether the people wearing them on stage like them or not, this style is suitable for the stage; that is, neither the viewers nor the wearers can find any fault with such clothes. The wearers might say, “These clothes You chose for us are too tacky; I would absolutely never wear such clothes in my daily life.” My reply to that is that I do not interfere with what you wear in your daily life. What you wear and what you like represent who you are; they represent your humanity and essence. If you do not like simple, tasteful, dignified, and upright clothes, but instead like outlandish clothes, then you are quite unconventional. If you like baring your chest and back, wearing your hair down, and donning big sunglasses, always acting like a celebrity, then I say you are not a member of God’s house. You do not like being dignified and upright; at the very least, you are incompatible with Me. Being dignified and upright, and tasteful and appropriate—this is the principle for choosing clothing styles. Then how should the clothing colors be chosen? Some people say, “White represents holiness, green represents life, red represents festivity, and yellow represents friendship, so we should just choose these colors.” I say this is pure nonsense; colors do not represent anything. Then what is the principle for which colors to wear? It is very simple; there is just one principle: It must look clean on camera. In particular, some colors are highly saturated and quite bright, and people might rarely wear them in their daily lives, but we chose these colors for the stage effect and the visual effect they provide. In one respect, these colors are relatively highly saturated and bright, so the stage effect they provide is good. In another respect, most of these colors are not very weird; there are no dull ones, and none that repulse people, so videos produced in this way have a good effect.

What I just fellowshipped on were principles for choosing dance program costumes. Which aspects of these have you seen clearly? Tell Me, are these principles I have considered appropriate? (Yes.) It mainly revolves around the principles of bearing witness to God, not bringing shame upon God, and achieving the best results, does it not? (It does.) Are there any aspects of this that are distorted or extreme? (No.) Is there any element of sticking to the old ways? (No.) In no way is it distorted or sticking to the old ways. So do these principles of ours for choosing costumes follow tradition, or do they follow modernity? (They follow neither tradition nor modernity; as long as the programs we produce can achieve the result of bearing witness to God, that is the best.) You have finally understood; the purpose of these programs is to bear witness to God, and nothing else. Bearing witness to God requires considering that we must not bring shame upon God or make God’s house look bad. Of course, we must also consider that the fabric and style of the costumes should be comfortable to wear. That is to say, any dignified and upright person who sees you wearing these clothes would think of them as acceptable, that you look like a believer in God, and that you are able to represent God’s people, rather than come off as a nonbeliever, or some movie star or singer—and at a single glance, one can tell that you’re a dignified and upright person. Judging by this, do you think that My viewpoints for treating things and the principles I follow within My normal humanity are the same as yours? (No.) They are definitely not the same. So tell Me, are these principles I follow lofty and grand? Are they extraordinary? They are not lofty and grand at all. They are particularly normal. The principles I adopt and the results I aim to achieve in doing things are all highly practical, and I never show off. If we were to go by the way you all view things, in choosing costumes for programs we’d either be traditional and stick to the old ways, or follow worldly trends. Some people say, “Smokey eye makeup, false eyelashes, nose rings and big earrings are popular in the world. We too should dress the brothers and sisters to be handsome and beautiful. Not only should their clothes be gorgeous, but their makeup should be seductive. They shouldn’t be outdone by the singers and movie stars of the world, and should look even classier and more lavish. Believers in God should be more noble than them, so this is the direction we should take when dressing the performers.” So why is it that these performers don’t end up going out on stage with a single gorgeous item on them? Because I am here vetting everything. Whether they are modernists or traditionalists, they have all been shunted aside—they don’t have any opportunities to flaunt their “skills.” They’ve been restrained by Me. If you were the ones doing the vetting, would you give these people the opportunity to flaunt their “skills”? (No.) Why not? (If given the opportunity, they would go off the rails. They wouldn’t follow the principles required by God’s house.) If given the opportunity, they would dress the performers up as demons. They would produce entertainment programs like those popular in society, turning programs intended to bear witness to God into entertainment programs that please the public, and making the people that feature in them look like demons and ghosts. Would the programs still be watchable then? The programs would change in nature; they would not be bearing witness to God but bringing shame upon God, and they would deserve to be cursed and banned. This would not be doing a duty, but doing evil. Do you understand? (Yes.) You did not even understand such a minor matter. Now that I have put it more plainly and simply, some people have a sudden realization: “So that’s how it is. Now I know why God’s house chooses such costumes for its dance programs.” No matter what age it is, what is the principle people should follow? It is to take the word of God as the principle in all things. In doing any item of work or handling any matter, your first goal should be to edify people, and your second should be to bear witness to God’s work. These are the two principles. So, in all matters, these are the two principles people should abide by. The normality and practicality possessed within the normal humanity of God incarnate, then, also consist solely in following these principles. The principles do not change; God incarnate neither follows tradition nor modernity. The principle that I abide by within My normal humanity is to conduct Myself and do things within the scope of conscience and reason. So what principles do I follow in doing the work of God’s house? It is to benefit people in everything I do—doing things that benefit and edify them. In addition, it is to do the work of bearing witness to God, following the principles of bearing witness to God and propagating God’s words. Would you say this is the case? (Yes.) By fellowshipping like this, do you now understand Me better? (Yes.) If I don’t talk about these things in detail, you won’t be clear on them. You cannot even fathom such a simple matter. In fact, it’s not profound at all; it’s all very practical and ordinary. How ordinary is it? It highly conforms to the rationality of normal humanity. That is to say, if you have the rationality of normal humanity, you can understand it, but if you do not, it will be very difficult for you to understand—I’ll have to explain it clearly and thoroughly, putting it plainly and spelling it out for you, before you can understand what is going on. It’s such a simple matter, not even amounting to the level of the truth principles, yet you still cannot explain it clearly. What is going on here? Is this matter profound and unfathomable? (No.) Then why can’t you explain it clearly? Broadly speaking, it’s because you do not understand the truth. On a more detailed level, it’s because your normal humanity and rationality lack certain things and have defects. When it comes to being dignified and upright, you stick to tradition and to the old ways. When it comes to normal humanity, you think that having normal humanity means being guileless, like a fool. Doesn’t this show that your caliber is truly poor and that you do not have any comprehension ability? (Yes.) That is exactly the problem. Alright, that’s enough on that.